truthfulpolitics.com

Oct 072010
 
Share

PLA had an article on economic growth:

  • GDP stands for Gross Domestic Product and is the measure for economic production. The higher the GDP, the higher the economic production.
  • For the twenty years for which Republican presidents submitted budgets, the average rate of GDP growth was 2.94%.
  • For the twenty years in which Democratic presidents submitted budgets, the average rate of GDP growth was 3.92%.

To read the entire article, click on Just for the Record Part III.

Oct 072010
 
Share

Kelsey Golden in September of 2008 posted an article on ScoopThis.org illustrating relationships between state unemployment rates, controlling political party, and state income taxes.

  • 40% of the states with the unemployment rate higher than the national average are controlled by Republicans”
  • 60% of the states with the unemployment rate higher than the national average are controlled by Democrats.
  • States with a higher-than-national-average unemployment rate have an average state income tax rate of 5.345%
  • “Republicans definitively control 70% of the 10 states with the lowest unemployment rates”
  • Democrats definitively control 20% of the 10 states with the lowest unemployment rates
  • The remaining 10%, Oklahoma, is not controlled by one particular party
  • The average state income tax in the 10 states with the lowest unemployment rates is 5.023%
  • The top 5 lowest unemployment rate states have a state income tax 3.46% compared to the average of 6.08% for the 5 states with the highest unemployment rates.

To read the entire article, click on High Unemployment Rates Tied to Democrat Controlled States and Higher State Taxes; States with Lower Rates Controlled by Republicans with Lower State Taxes.

Oct 072010
 
Share

Dan Ackman on Forbes.com did an analysis comparing Democratic presidents and Republican presidents.

  • Employment gains per year from 1953-2001 were 1.684 million/year under Democratic presidents and 1.279 million/year under Republican presidents.
  • Real Disposable Personal Income Growth per year from 1953-2001 was 3.65% under Democratic presidents and 3.08% under Republican presidents.

To read the entire article click on Presidents And Prosperity.

Oct 072010
 
Share

Laura Rowley on Yahoo Finance asked “what’s at the heart of the U.S. savings problem?” According to Ron Wilcox, professor at the Darden School of Business at the University of Virginia, the answer is “the widening gap between rich and poor. The concentration of income among the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans has roughly doubled in the last 30 years. In 2004, for example, the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans enjoyed a 12.5 percent increase in income, while the bottom 99 percent gained only 1.5 percent.”

To read the entire article, click on Double Bind: Savers on the Hook for Squanderers.

Oct 072010
 
Share

The Center for American Progress in April 2007 reported the following statistics on poverty in the U.S.A.:

  • Persistent childhood poverty costs the U.S. an estimated $500 billion annually
  • Poverty for a family of four is defined as annual family income below $19,971
  • 12.6% of all Americans were below the above threshold in in 2005
  • 31% of all Americans, meaning more than 90 million people, “had incomes below 200 percent of federal poverty thresholds”
  • “One third of all Americans will experience poverty within a 13-year period”
  • In that 13-year time period, “one in 10 Americans are poor for most of the time, and one in 20 are poor for 10 or more years”
  • The U.S. ranks 24 out of 25 countries in terms of the percentage of the population earning 50% below the median income
  • “The richest 1 percent of Americans in 2005 held the largest share of the nation’s income (19 percent) since 1929. At the same time, the poorest 20 percent of Americans held only 3.4 percent of the nation’s income.”

To read the entire report, click on From Poverty to Prosperity: A National Strategy to Cut Poverty in Half.

Oct 072010
 
Share

Jeremy Scahill in The Nation in May 2009 mentioned the following:

  • Master electricians testified before Congress that KBR electrical work was faulty.
  • Senator Frank Lautenberg mentioned that 18 U.S. soldiers have died due to KBR’s work.
  • The U.S. Department of Defense paid KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, $80 million in bonuses for electrical wiring in Iraq.
  • The bonuses were paid after the deaths of U.S. soldiers.

To read the entire article, click on KBR Got Bonuses for Work that Killed Soldiers.


Jeremy Scahill in The Nation in October 2009 mentioned the following:

  • The top 100 government contractors earned almost $300 billion from federal contracts in 2007
  • Since 1995, these same top 100 contractors “have been involved with 676 cases of ‘misconduct’ and paid $26 billion in fines to settle cases stemming from fraud, waste or abuse”
  • Pfizer in September paid $2.3 billion to settle criminal and civil cases, including Medicaid fraud
  • Pfizer, which earned more than $40 billion in profits in 2008, won $73 million in federal contracts in 2007
  • “Over the past fifteen years, ACORN” has received $53 million in federal funds, “much of it for low-income housing.”
  • “In mid-September all but seventy-five House Democrats and seven senators voted with their Republican colleagues to bar the group [Acorn] from receiving federal funds”
  • Neither Pfizer nor the other large contractors are targets of significant Congressional action.

To read the entire article, click on The ACORN Standard.

The list of the top contractors referred to in the article is from Project on Government Oversight. For example, the top 5 government contractors in 2007 were Lockheed Martin, Boeing Company, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, and Raytheon Company. $104 billion in federal contracts in 2007 and $3.3 billion in misconduct fees since 1995. To view the entire list, click on Federal Contractor Misconduct Database.